The U.S. Supreme Court granted a last-minute reprieve to a Georgia man fewer than two hours before he was to be executed for the 1989 slaying of an off-duty police officer. Troy Anthony Davis first learned that his execution had been stayed when he saw it on the news, he told CNN in an exclusive phone interview minutes after the stay was announced.
Davis has long said he didn’t kill a Savannah, Georgia, police officer, and the U.S. Supreme Court was the last option for Davis to have his execution postponed. It was scheduled to move forward at 7 p.m. ET.
Davis, 39, was convicted in 1991 of killing Officer Mark MacPhail as MacPhail responded to an altercation in a Burger King parking lot.
Seven of the nine witnesses who initially testified that Davis was the killer have recanted. There was no physical evidence presented at his trial, and no weapon was found. But Davis’ petitions for a new trial have been denied.
Many had asked Georgia to grant Davis a new trial: celebrities like Susan Sarandon, Harry Belafonte and the Indigo Girls; world leaders such as former President Carter, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Pope Benedict XVI; and former and current U.S. lawmakers like Bob Barr, Carolyn Moseley Braun and John Lewis.
Amnesty International has issued a 39-page report questioning his conviction, and protesters have been gathering at the Georgia Capitol in Atlanta this week. Davis is scheduled to be executed at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson.
MacPhail’s mother, Anneliese MacPhail of Columbus, told media outlets last week that she is “disgusted” by the calls to spare Davis’ life and is not convinced by Davis’ supporters’ claims that there is a more likely suspect.
On Tuesday, Anneliese MacPhail said, “There is no possibility he’s innocent, not according to what’s been said in court.”
“Troy Davis was judged by his peers. All the courts have found him guilty. It was proven he was guilty. Please let us have some peace. Let Mark rest in peace. Let justice be done,” she said.
Davis’ sister, Martina Correia, said she was sleepless Monday night and was spending Tuesday at his side. She said she planned to stay until prison officials told her to leave at 3 p.m.
“We are still holding on to hope,” she said Tuesday morning. “We still hope the U.S. Supreme Court will look into my brother’s case and give some relief. We will have a lot of family time with him and recall old times and pray together.”
The Georgia Supreme Court turned down the plea for a stay in Davis’ execution Monday, saying the U.S. Supreme Court “properly has jurisdiction over Davis’ pending petition.”
The Supreme Court called an emergency session to hear the petition Tuesday.
Davis was convicted of MacPhail’s 1989 murder largely on the testimony of nine witnesses.
“When you only have eyewitness testimony and you have no physical evidence, people have fallacies and people make mistakes,” Correia said.
Davis’ lawyers and supporters say this is a case of mistaken identity. Seven of the nine trial witnesses have changed their statements, saying they were mistaken, they feared retribution from the man they say actually killed MacPhail or that police pressured them into fingering Davis.
During the trial, witnesses said Davis and two other men were harassing a homeless man and followed him across the street from a parking lot at the Greyhound bus station in Savannah.
MacPhail was off-duty. He saw the skirmish and ran over to break up the fight. MacPhail was shot, and witnesses told police Davis fired the two shots that killed him.
A manhunt ensued. Davis surrendered nine days later.
Monty Holmes is one of the witnesses who said Davis was the culprit. He has changed his story and alleges that police coerced him.
“They were trying to get to me to say that he did it, but I know he didn’t do it,” Holmes said last year at a rally for Davis.
Savannah police Maj. Everett Ragan headed the MacPhail investigation. He denies allegations of coercion and said he doesn’t believe the witnesses who have changed their stories.
Shortly before Davis was scheduled to be executed last year, Ragan told CNN, “There is no doubt in my mind we arrested the right man.”
The Georgia Supreme Court also was unimpressed with the witnesses’ new stories. In affirming the trial court’s judgment in a 4-3 decision, the majority said that the witnesses’ new testimony failed to meet the necessary benchmark: that their original testimony “in every material part is purest fabrication.”
The court also was unconvinced by allegations that one of the men Davis was with that night, Sylvester “Red” Coles, killed MacPhail.
In a telephone interview in 2007, Davis acknowledged that he never told police that Coles killed MacPhail.
“I didn’t because I didn’t want to be a snitch,” Davis said. “Yes, I know that’s stupid.”
Coles has never been charged with the murder and, according to court documents, has testified at least twice that he was not the killer.
Davis’ lawyers claim that there are other people who saw what happened that night. Those witnesses have never testified in court but have submitted affidavits, the attorneys say.
On Monday, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles said it typically does not comment on clemency appeals but defended itself because Davis’ case has received such widespread attention. The statement noted that the board postponed Davis’ execution last year and has studied the case for a year.
“After an exhaustive review of all available information regarding the Troy Davis case and after considering all possible reasons for granting clemency, the board has determined that clemency is not warranted,” the statement said.
So, how do you feel about this? Personally, I’m glad he received the stay. There have been too many convictions overturned by DNA evidence over the last few years for me to feel good about anyone being put to death without airtight, concrete evidence. With seven of the nine witnesses recanting, and no physical evidence whatsoever, the death penalty just seems like a big mistake to me. Death is permanent. What do they say to his family when they find out later on that he was actually innocent?
Your thoughts?
Technorati Tags: Troy Anthony, Anthony receives stay of execution, death penalty









Thursday, 25. September 2008
I agree that the death penalty should only be given to those with concrete solid evidence that they committed the crime - and then I think that as soon as the judgment is handed down a button should be pushed and the penalty should be acted upon immediately. No more of this six to twenty years before the punishment is carried out. But that is only in cases of solid, non-reputable evidence.
Susans last blog post..Knitting Round - n - Round
[Reply to this comment]
Leigh Reply:
September 26th, 2008 at 12:34 am
I couldn’t agree with you more, Susan. Twenty years of appeals and stays is just ridiculous. They might has well commute their sentence to life if it’s going to take that long! And you’re so right — it should only be done if there is absolute, corroborated and irrefutable evidence.
By the way, GREAT to “see” you!

[Reply to this comment]
Monday, 29. September 2008
If he was found guilty under several different trials, I don’t understand why this is really in question?
Amanda
[Reply to this comment]
Leigh Reply:
October 11th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
He only had one trial. His appeals have been turned down, but there was just only one trial. Why is it a big deal? Because “Seven of the nine trial witnesses have changed their statements, saying they were mistaken, they feared retribution from the man they say actually killed MacPhail or that police pressured them into fingering Davis.” That sounds like a pretty big deal to me. Death is final and forever. They better be damn sure someone is guilty before killing them!
[Reply to this comment]
Wednesday, 1. October 2008
How can anyone refute that 7 of the 9 eye witnesses have recanted? That is an overwhelming majority. Are the remaining 2 more credible than the other 7? Death is final.
anti aging skin cares last blog post..Deep Wrinkle Cream Essentials
[Reply to this comment]
Leigh Reply:
October 11th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Exactly. Couldn’t agree with you more. Thanks for commenting!
[Reply to this comment]